C. B. BOYETT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE UNITED STATES
C. B. BOYETT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
THE UNITED STATES
207 U.S. 581
Supreme Court of the United States (1907)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with a direction to sustain the motion in arrest of judgment, on- the authority of Hodges v. United States, 203 U. S. 1.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hallowell v. United States, 221 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1911)…ion and control over Indian lands remained in the United States, Congress had the right to forbid the intro [*324] duetion of liquor into such territory, and to provide for the punishment of those found guilty thereof. Couture, Jr. v. United States, 207 U. S. 581, was cited where á conviction for introducing liquor into the Indian country was affirmed. In the case at bar, the United States had not parted with the title to the lands, but still held them in trust for the Indians. In that situation its power t…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1906)