PENNSYLVANIA COAL AND COKE COMPANY
v.
CASSATT
PENNSYLVANIA COAL AND COKE COMPANY
CASSATT
207 U.S. 187
Supreme Court of the United States (1907)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 28 S. Ct. 110 · 52 L. Ed. 163 · 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1213 · SCDB 1907-018
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:
For the reasons given in thé preceding case the'judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with a direction to disriiiss the writ of error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853 (Fla. 1943)…s of the State of Florida. A trial under such a void charge was without legal foundation and was not sufficient to constitute jeopardy. See 15 American Jurisprudence [*858] 49, Sec. 374. Also see Shoener v. Pennsylvania, 207 U.S. 188, 52 L. Ed. 163, 28 S. Ct. 110, Black v. State, 36 Ga. 447, 91 Am. Dec. 772, overruled on another point by Brown v. State, 109 Ga. 570, 34 S. E. 1031; Bennett v. Com. 150 Ky. 604, 150 S. W. 806, 43 L. R. A. (N.S.) 419; State v. Schyhart (Mo) 199 S. W. 205, citing R.C.L., State v.…
-
United States v. McCLURE, 356 F.2d 939 (6th Cir. 1966)…Defendant-Appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the Defendant-Appellant was placed in double jeopardy under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution? In Shoener v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 207 U.S. 188, 28 S.Ct. 110, 52 L.Ed. 163 (1907), the Court held: “one is not put in jeopardy if the indictment under which he is tried is so radically defective that it would not support a judgment of conviction, and that a judgment thereon would be arrested on motion”. Her…