ROSA M. COLE, EXECUTRIX, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS ET AL.
ROSA M. COLE, EXECUTRIX, ETC., PETITIONER,
THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS ET AL.
203 U.S. 592
Supreme Court of the United States (1906)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re The Arb. between Interbras Cayman Co. v. Orient Victory Shipping Co., S.A., 663 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1981)…closed principal may enforce a contract made for its benefit “even though the [obligee] did not know there was an undisclosed principal.” Morris [*7] v. Chesapeake & O.S.S. Co., 125 F. 62, 66 (S.D.N.Y.1903), aff’d, 148 F. 11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 203 U.S. 592, 27 S.Ct. 781, 51 L.Ed. 331 (1906). However, Orient asserts that it has rebutted Interbras’ showing of agency sufficiently to require a trial of the issue under 9 U.S.C. § 4 which provides in pertinent part: If the making of the arbitration agreeme…