CARL S. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
CARL S. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
203 U.S. 584
Supreme Court of the United States (1906)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, decided October 22, and cases cited.
Mr. Clayton B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. A. Hull for defendant in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Riley v. W.E. Grissett, Jr., 556 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…rial court erred in taking cognizance of rights asserted by and through it. As appellant ably points out, the equities involved in the instant case are similar to [*476] those involved in Strong v. Smith, 68 NJ.Eq. 686, 60 A. 66 (N.J.1905), aff'd., 203 U.S. 584, 27 S.Ct. 782, 51 L.Ed. 328 (1906) (cited with approval in Dundee Naval Stores Company, supra). In Strong, the foreclosed mortgagor’s brother-in-law had an unrecorded lease with the mortgagor and claimed an equitable interest in the premises after…
Authorities Cited
- Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1905)