THOMAS C. GUTIERREZ ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. THOMAS J. CURRAN ET AL.
THOMAS C. GUTIERREZ ET AL., APPELLANTS,
THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. THOMAS J. CURRAN ET AL.
202 U.S. 614
Supreme Court of the United States (1906)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction' on the authority of Albright v. Sandoval, 200 U. S. 9.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Municipality of Ponce v. Roman Catholic Apostolic Church in Porto RICO, 210 U.S. 296 (U.S. 1908)…roduced in the margin.1 “We do not deem it necessary to analyze the text of the act of Congress to point out the inevitable result just stated, since the obvious meaning of the act is established by a decision heretofore rendered. Dones v. Urrutia, 202 U. S. 614. On appeal to this court the questions raised were fully argued in printed briefs, but were deeméd to be of such a frivolous character as not to require an opinion, and were hence disposed of per curiam, referring to the provisions of the statute an…
-
Kent v. People of Porto RICO, 207 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1907)…d in the margin.1 We do not deem it necessary to analyze the text of the act [*117] of Congress to point out the inevitable result just stated, since the obvious meaning of the act is established by a decision heretofore rendered. Dones v. Urrutia, 202 U. S. 614. In that case Dones, who had been convicted and sentenced to death for murder, unsuccessfully sought release by habeas corpus at the hands of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico upon the identical ground presented in the assignment of error which we are…
Authorities Cited
- Albright v. Territory of New Mexico Ex rel. Sandoval, 200 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1906)