ROYAL PACKING COMPANY
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1905-12-29
No. 86
199 U.S. 579 Supreme Court of the United States (1905) Caution
Also reported at: 50 L. Ed. 316 · 26 S. Ct. 159 · 1905 U.S. LEXIS 951 · SCDB 1905-028
Cited by 11 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This case depends upon a similar state of facts, involves the same questions of law as those in the preceding case, and. is also

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stearns & Culver Lumber Co. v. Fowler, 58 Fla. 362 (Fla. 1909)
    …ences in employments, and not merely to different employers. See Florida East Coast Ry. v. Lassiter, 58 Fla. 234, 50 South. Rep. 428; Kiley v. Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 138 Wis. 215, 119 N. W. Rep. 309; Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U. S. 593, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 159; Cooper v. Shannon, 36 Colo. 98, 85 Pac. Rep. 175; Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. Firstbrook, 36 Colo. 498, 86 Pac. Rep. 313, S. C. 10 Am. & Eng. Anno. Cas. 1108 and notes; Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Rail Road Corporation, 4 Met. (Mas…
  • …pseed, 219 U. S. 35, 31 S. Ct. 136, 55 L. Ed. 78, 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 226, Ann. Cas. 1912-A, 463. The construction which a state, through its highest court, places upon its own statute is binding upon us. Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U. S. 593, 26 S. Ct. 159, 50 L. E. 322; Mobile, etc., R. Co. v. Turnipseed supra; W. & A. R. Co. v. Henderson, supra. We are therefore of opinion that Section 7051 of the Compiled Statutes of Florida does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the Unit…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw