CHICAGO AND WESTERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THOMAS NEWELL

U.S. | 1905-04-17
No. 493
198 U.S. 579 Supreme Court of the United States (1905) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311; Bethell v. Demaret, 10 Wall. 537, 540; Oxley Stave Company v. Butler County, 166 U. S. 648, 653; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 96; Railroad Company v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, 450; Railroad Company v. Barron, 5 Wall. 104; Ill. Stat., 3 Starr and Curtis, 3247, c. 114, par. 53; Railway Company v. Hart, 209 Illinois, 414; Glenn v. Garth, 147. U. S. 368; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207, 216. Case below, 72 N. E. Rep. 416.

Mr. George W. Kretzinger for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harvey Lantz for defendant in error.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Amtorg Trading Corp. v. United States, 71 F.2d 524 (C.C.P.A. 1934)
    …k. Chicago & N. W. Railway Co. v. Whitton, 13 Wall. 270, 283, 20 L. Ed. 571; Case of the Sewing Mach. Companies, 18 Wall. 553, 575, 21 L. Ed. 914; Mississippi & R. River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403, 407, 25 L. Ed. 2.08; Doctor v. Harrington, 198 U. S. 579, 586, 25 S. Ct. 355, 357, 49 L. Ed. 606. This rule of law as to citizenship was one which was the result of difficulties arising from suits begun in the courts of the United States by citizens of one state against corporations domiciled in, other s…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw