J. W. TONEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MACON
J. W. TONEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MACON
195 U.S. 625
Supreme Court of the United States (1904)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the Authority of Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, 145 U. S. 608, 611; Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130, and cases cited. See Charleston, etc., Railway Co. v. Miller, 115 Georgia, 92; Augusta Railway Company v. Andrews, 92 Georgia, 706.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brinkley v. Hassig, 83 F.2d 351 (10th Cir. 1936)….Ed. 352, Ann.Cas.l917B, 801; Collins v. Texas, 223 U.S. 288, 32 S.Cr, 286, 56 L.Ed. 439; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U.S. 505, 23 S.Ct. 390, 47 L.Ed. 563; Meffert v. Medical Board, 66 Kan. 710, 72 P. 247, 1 L.R.A. (N.S.) 811, affirmed Meffert v. Packer, 195 U.S. 625, 25 S.Ct. 790, 49 L.Ed. 350. Statutes which permit of revocation for “unprofessional conduct,” “incompetency,” “grossly immoral conduct” have been held valid in the large majority of jurisdictions notwithstanding their generality. Green v. Blanchar…
Authorities Cited
- Haseltine v. Cent. Bank OF Springfield, 183 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1901)
- Meagher v. Minn. Thresher Mfg. Co., 145 U.S. 608 (U.S. 1892)