OWENSBORO WATER WORKS COMPANY OF OWENSBORO, KY., APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF OWENSBORO, KY.
OWENSBORO WATER WORKS COMPANY OF OWENSBORO, KY., APPELLANT,
CITY OF OWENSBORO, KY.
193 U.S. 667
Supreme Court of the United States (1904)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Company, 191 U. S. 150.
Mr. William. 7\ Ellis and Mr. J. D. Atchison for appellant. Mr. Reuben A. Miller, Mr. Geo. W. Jolly, Mr. Charles S. Walker and Mr. Robert S. Todd for appellee. 1 •
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. Fernanda Peterson, 375 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)…*297] Had the lessee prevailed on the question whether the lessor did in fact use good efforts to relet, the lessor’s right of recovery would have been entirely defeated. Weeks v. International Trust Co., 125 F. 370 (1st Cir. 1903), error dismissed, 193 U.S. 667, 24 S.Ct. 853, 48 L.Ed. 839 (1904); Kanter, v. Safran, 99 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1958). But the fact that there is a dispute as to whether a debt is actually due has no bearing on the question of entitlement to prejudgment interest. The rule is that if it…
Authorities Cited
- City of Joplin v. Sw. Mo. Light Co., 191 U.S. 150 (U.S. 1903)