JACOB E. JACOBSEN ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
DALLES, PORTLAND AND ASTORIA NAVIGATION COMPANY
JACOB E. JACOBSEN ET AL., PETITIONERS,
DALLES, PORTLAND AND ASTORIA NAVIGATION COMPANY
191 U.S. 575
Supreme Court of the United States (1903)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
May-Som Gulf, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 869 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1989)…he district court correctly explained that in Ohio, the general rule is that rights under a contract may be assigned and duties may be delegated. See American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Baltimore & O.S. R.R., 124 F. 866, 871-73 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 191 U.S. 575, 24 S.Ct. 846, 48 L.Ed. 308 (1903); Crowe v. Riley, 63 Ohio St. 1, 5, 57 N.E. 956 (1900); Himrod Furnace Co. v. Cleveland & M. R.R., 22 Ohio St. 451, 460 (1872). Because the Gulf franchise agreements include a contract for the sale of motor fuel, t…