LA CONCEPTION. THE SPANISH CONSUL, CLAIMANT

U.S. | 1821-03-08
6 Wheat. 235 Supreme Court of the United States (1821)
Also reported at: 5 L. Ed. 249 · 1821 U.S. LEXIS 359 · SCDB 1821-019
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Spanish Consul sought to recover a captured Spanish vessel, La Conception, but the captors claimed the capturing ship was owned by a foreign government after being sold in Buenos Aires. The Supreme Court held that new evidence showed the capturing vessel was originally built, owned, and equipped in the United States, and there was no credible proof of a genuine sale abroad, requiring restoration of the property to the Spanish owners and reversing the lower court's decision.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Story

Mr. Justice Story delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, if the cause had stood solely upon the evidence before the Circuit Court, we should have no difficulty in affirming its decision. But upon the new proofs which have been since taken, and are now produced to this Court, it is apparent that the capturing vessel was originally built, equipped, manned, and armed in the United States for a cruize, being owned by citizens of this country, and sailed with the intent of cruizing against Spain. It is true that she went to Buenos Ayres, ánd sailed under the colours of that government on a second cruize, during which this capture was made ; -but, there is no satisfactory evidence that the American ownership ever ceased, or that there was a real, bona fide sale at Buenos Ayres. If such a sale had really taken place, it was perfectly in the power o’f the captors to have proved it, in the clearest manner. A bill of sale is the customary and universal document by which the ownership of vessels is evidenced ; and the want of any document of this nature, or of any direct and positive evidence of an actual sale, leaves no doubt m the mind of the Court, that no such sale ever was made. The consequence is, that the capturing vessel must still be considered, as owned in the United States; and, according to the decisions which have already been made, the capture was illegal, and the property must be restored to the original Spanish owners.

Sentence reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw