PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ON THE RELATION OF GEORGE F. RAYBURN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,

v.

HUGH A. BINNS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (U.S. 1978)
  …of conviction in the minds of the jury, but produced by suffering of mind or body." The Queen v. Charlesworth, 1 B. & S., at 503-504, 121 Eng. Rep., at 802. United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. 579; Logan v. United States, 144 U. S. 263; Moss v. Glenn, 189 U. S. 506; Keerl v. Montana, 213 U. S. 135; Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71. It should be noted, however, that the rationale for this deference in the “hung” jury situation is that the trial court is in the best position to assess all the factors which must…
• Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1961)
  …ent. Mistrial because the jury was unable to agree is the classic example; and that was the critical [*371] circumstance in United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. 515; Logan v. United States, 144 U. S. 263; Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71; Moss v. Glenn, 189 U. S. 506; Keerl v. Montana, 213 U. S. 135. Tactical situations of an army in the field have been held to justify the withdrawal of a court-martial proceeding and the institution of another one in calmer days. Wade v. Hunter, 336 U. S. 684. Discovery by the j…
• United States v. Dante Edward Gori, 282 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …imilar contentions were made and rejected in Himmelfarb v. United States, 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F. 2d 924, 931-932, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 860, 70 S.Ct. 103, 94 L.Ed. 527; Ex parte Glenn, C.C.N.D.W.Va.1901, 111 F. 257, 259, reversed on other grounds 189 U.S. 506, 23 S.Ct. 851, 47 L.Ed. 921; United States v. Watson, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1868, 28 Fed.Cas. page 499, No. 16,651. Under different circumstances than here present one court may have implied consent from a failure to object to a mistrial order. In Scott v. U…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Castillo v. McCONNICO, 168 U.S. 674 (U.S. 1898)
• Erie R.R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1902)
• Butler v. Gage, 138 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1891)