CHICAGO HOUSE WRECKING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
OTTO C. BIRNEY
CHICAGO HOUSE WRECKING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
OTTO C. BIRNEY
187 U.S. 642
Supreme Court of the United States (1902)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. of Wichita v. City OF Florala (M.D. Ala. 1931)…clusive of interest, although a plea of limitations is sustained to some of the coupons sued on, which reduces the amount of recovery below that sum. Board of Com’rs of Kearny County, Kan., v. Vandriss, 115 F. 866, 53 C. C. A. 192, certiorari denied 187 U. S. 642, 23 S. Ct. 843, 47 L. Ed. 346. In some cases the amount in controversy was the amount of the bonds that have been repudiated and are attempted to be made null and void, and in that class of cases the main controversy was, not the amount charged aga…