HERBST
v.
STEAMSHIP "ASIATIC PRINCE."
HERBST
STEAMSHIP "ASIATIC PRINCE."
183 U.S. 697
Supreme Court of the United States (1901)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bouchard Transp. Co. Inc. v. The TUG "Ocean Prince", 691 F.2d 609 (2d Cir. 1982)…3); Atlantic Refining Co. v. Matson Navigation Co., 253 F. 2d 777, 778 (3rd Cir. 1958); Hines v. Sangstad S.S. Co., 266 F. 502, 506-07 (1st Cir. 1920); Simpson’s Patent Dry-Dock Co. v. Atlantic & E.S.S. Co., 108 F. 425, 428 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 183 U.S. 697, 22 S.Ct. 934, 46 L.Ed. 395 (1901). As to the latter situation, Judge Learned Hand in an often cited dictum explained the proposition as follows: If the owner of a damaged vessel puts her in dry dock to repair damages done by a collision, and whil…