THE NEUSTRA SENORA DE DA CARIDAD-BAGES ET AL. CLAIMANTS

U.S. | 1819-02-01
4 Wheat. 497 Supreme Court of the United States (1819) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 4 L. Ed. 624 · 1819 U.S. LEXIS 326 · SCDB 1819-030
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A Spanish merchant vessel seized by a privateers commissioned by the revolted Province of Cartagena, and subsequently captured by an American privateer who suspected its cargo was British, was claimed by the original Spanish owner seeking restitution through United States courts. The Supreme Court affirmed that American courts cannot assist a neutral nation in recovering property captured during a recognized war between Spain and its colonies, as doing so would compromise the nation's strict neutrality and potentially involve it in the conflict. The Court held that absent jurisdiction over the capture location or treaty violations, American courts must leave property in the state in which it was found within their jurisdiction.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Johnson

Mr. Justice Johnson delivered the' opinion of the Court. . This; case arose out of a capture made la the late war. The La Popa, a commissioned cruiser of. the Province of Carthagena, had made prize of the Caridad, a Spanish vessel, in a voyage1 from Jamaica, to Cuba. The American private armed vessel Harr rison fell'in. with the Caridad, then in'possession of the prize crew of the La Popa, anfi suspecting her cargo to be British, took possession of it, and transhipped it into their own vessel.. ‘ Oh the arrival of the Harrison in á port of North Carolina, the cargo was claimed both by the Caridad and La Popa, and' finally restored to the La=Popaj This.is an appeal from the decision of the Circuit Court of North Carolina, made by the original Spar, nish ownerj and the case has been submitted on the evidence and the grounds taken in the argument be- - lo^. '' There is no doubt ’that the property was Spanish, nor that the privateer La Popa was commissioned as a cruiser, whilst the Province of Carthagena had an organizéd government; and there' is/ the fullest evidence that her armament and equipment was unaffected by any charge of having' been made-in violar tion of our laws. ' ' ••• ••»'*•* . The only question in the case isj whether an ori-' , ginal Spanish owner is entitled to the aid of the ,,Courts of-this country, to restore to him property of which he has been dispossessed by capture, under, a commission derived from the revolted colonies ? and this question is considered, by this court, as having been fully decided by the principles assumed in the case of the United States v. Palmer,a at the last term, and by the decisions in the cases of the Estrellab and Divina Pastorac at the present term. War notoriously exists', and is recognized by our government to exist, between Spain and her colonies. This is an appeal to the highest of all tribunals on a question of right. No neutral nation can act against either, without taking part with the other in the war, All that, the law of nations requires of us, is strict arid impartial neutrality. And no friendly nation ought to demand of the Courts of this country to do an act which may involve it in a war with the victor. Our duty is, where the property of either is brought innocently within our jurisdiction, to leave things as we find them; much more to restore them to that state from which they, have been forcibly removed by the act of our own citizens. The* treaty with Spain can have.no bearing upon the case,.as. this Court cannot recognize such captors as pirates, and the capture was not made within pur jurisdic-tional. limits. In-those two cases only dues the treaty enjoin restitution. Decreté affirmed, with costs.,, a 3 Wheat. 610. b Ante, p. 298. c Ante, p. 52.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The S.S. Appam, 243 U.S. 124 (U.S. 1917)
  • Tex. Catastrophe Prop. Ins. Ass'n v. Morales, 975 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1992)
    …ministration of Texas government. It is clear to me that Texas’ CATPOOL scheme falls on the state side of the federalism markings left by Chief Justice Marshall in 1819. See Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518, 629-630, 4 L.Ed. 624 (1819) (“If the act of incorporation be a grant of political power, if it create a civil institution, to be employed in the administration of the government, or if the funds ... be public property, ... the subject is one in which the legislature of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw