BENT

v.

MIRANDA

Citator

Cited By

• Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed'n NO. 40, 300 U.S. 515 (U.S. 1937)
  …t is apparent that that which it can give will not be effective or of benefit to the plaintiff. Equity will not decree the execution of a partnership agreement since it cannot compel the parties to remain partners, see Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co., 168 U. S. 471, 482, or compel one to enter into performance of a contract of personal service which it cannot adequately control, Marble Company [*551] v. Ripley, 10 Wall. 339, 358; Karrick v. Hannaman, 168 U. S. 328, 336; Tobey v. Bristol, Fed. Cas. No. 14,065;…
• McMULLEN v. Hoffman, 174 U.S. 639 (U.S. 1899)
  …the agreement proved in this case, all of which they carried out, and included in which and as a consequence thereof was the agreement with the city and the written agreement of partnership between themselves. In Hyer v. Richmond Traction Company, 168 U. S. 471, in [*652] speaking as to the character of the agreement in that case, Mr. Justice Brewer remarked that the vice of a combination “ lies in the fact of secrecy, concealment and deception; the one applicant, though apparently antagonizing the other,…
• King Mechanism & Eng'g Co. v. W. Wheeled Scraper Co., 59 F.2d 546 (7th Cir. 1932)
  …nces from which it clearly appears that the proper relief cannot otherwise be had, and in no instance where there is adequate remedy at law. Raton Water Works Co. v. Raton, 174 U. S. 360, 19 S. Ct. 719, 43 L. Ed. 1005; Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co., 168 U. S. 471, 18 S. Ct. 114, 42 L. Ed. 547; Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 163 U. S. 564, 600, 16 S. Ct. 1173, 41 L. Ed. 265. Appellant would support equity jurisdiction here because in equity it would be entitled to recover appellee’s p…