HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
v.
D. M. DUNCAN, ET AL.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
D. M. DUNCAN, ET AL.
121 Fla. 354
Florida Supreme Court (1935)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 163 So. 925
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
In this case the same legal questions and principles of law are involved which were involved and determined by this Court in the case of Hillsborough County, *355Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., v. John F. DeSear and Mary DeSear, his wife. Therefore, the decree appealed from in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, filed July 1, 1935.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. City of Miami, 142 Fla. 284 (Fla. 1940)…in the city. This question is concluded in the affirmative by the following decisions of this Court: State v. City of Miami, 103 Fla. 54, 137 So. 261; State v. City of Miami, 116 Fla. 517, 157 So. 13; Folks and State v. Marion County, 121 Fla. 17, 163 So. 925; State v. City of Orlando, 126 Fla. 251, 170 So. 887; State v. City of Lakeland, 132 Fla. 489, 180 So. 754. The form of the proposed refunding bonds prescribed in Resolution 15996 has been examined and found to contain proper and sufficient recital…