IN RE RISER, PETITIONER, IN RE TYLER, PETITIONER, IN RE GAINES, PETITIONER
IN RE RISER, PETITIONER, IN RE TYLER, PETITIONER, IN RE GAINES, PETITIONER
149 U.S. 191
Supreme Court of the United States (1892)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller :
The differences between the general facts in these cases and in that just considered are not controlling as to the result, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the applications for the writ of habeas corpus are severally
Denied..
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. Wilson (N.D. Tex. 1929)…ng, and to save from hurtful catastrophe. The rule is unquestioned that the court, having the custody of property for administration, may preserve it from external attack. Ex parte Tyler, 149 U. S. 164, 13 S. Ct. 785, 37 L. Ed. 689; Ex parte Riser, 149 U. S. 191, 13 S. Ct. 793, 37 L. Ed. 698. It would be absurd to permit the institution of suits in other forums to recover received property or to diminish its value. Buckhannon & N. R. Co. v. Davis (C. C. A.) 135 F. 707. Creditors with liens are enjoined from…