BRENHAM
v.
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK

U.S. | 1892-05-02
Nos. 2; No. 120
144 U.S. 549 Supreme Court of the United States (1892) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 36 L. Ed. 390 · 12 S. Ct. 975 · 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2098 · SCDB 1891-270
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

If is ordered by the court that leav$ be . granted to file a petition for rehearing herein, which being considered,

If is ordered by the court that the judgment entered in this court on the 28th day of March, 1892, be, and the same is hereby, vacated and set aside, and a judgment is now this day entered reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States for the "Western District of Texas, and remanding said cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with. the opinion of this court hereinbefore filed, and thé petition for rehearing is

Denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Minute Maid Corp. v. United Foods, Inc., 291 F.2d 577 (5th Cir. 1961)
    …hmitt, supra, expressly stands for the proposition that “even an express stipulation between them that one should not be so liable, though good between themselves, is ineffectual as against third persons.” (quoting Meehan v. Valentine, 145 U.S. 623, 12 S.Ct. 975.) It is the burden of appellee’s argument here that if there is nothing more than a lender relationship, coupled with an agreement that compensation for the loan is to be in the form of a sharing in profits, either in lieu of or in addition to norm…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw