SEIBERT
v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. HARSHMAN

U.S. | 1889-01-21
No. 130
129 U.S. 192 Supreme Court of the United States (1889) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 32 L. Ed. 645 · 9 S. Ct. 271 · 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1677 · SCDB 1888-100
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice Field

Mr. Justice Field delivered the opinion of the court.

^ The facts of this case are similar to those in Seibert v. Lewis, before the court at its October term, 1886, 122 U. S. 284, and it is admitted-by the counsel for the plaintiff in error that the decision there, if adhered to, will control here. He, however, as.ks us to reconsider our rulings and reverse our former judgment. We see no reason to justify such reconsideration and change of position. The very elaborate argument of counsel is but a re-presenta.tion of the reasons originally offered against the decision in that and analogous cases. Seibert v. Lewis was very carefully and elaborately considered, and to the doctrines there announced we adhere. Upon its authority

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miss. River Fuel Corp. v. The United States, 314 F.2d 953 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
    …is not one included in paragraphs (A), (B), or (C), if the employees’ rights to or derived from such employer’s contribution or such compensation are nonforfeitable at the time the contribution or compensation is paid.” . Seibert v. United States, 129 U.S. 192, 9 S.Ct. 271, 32 L.Ed. 643 (1889) ; Patterson v. United States, 359 U.S. 495, 79 S.Ct. 936, 3 L.Ed.2d 971 (1959). . Produce Reporter Company, 18 T.C. 69 (1952), affirmed C. I. R. v. Produce Reporter Co., 207 F. 2d 586 (C.A.7, 1953) ; McClintock-Tru…
  • Hubbert v. Campbellsville Lumber Co., 191 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1903)
  • Tin Decorating Co. of Baltimore v. Metal Package Corp. (S.D.N.Y. 1928)
    …e Bliss machine, installed during George’s employment and with his consent. Both under the statute (R. S. § 4899; 35 USCA § 48), and by implication from the facts, a license to use the Bliss machine is entirely clear. Wade v. Metcalf, 129 U. S. 292, 9 S. Ct. 271, 32 L. Ed. 661; Dable Grain Shovel Co. v. Flint, 137 U. S. 41, 11 S. Ct. 8, 34 L. Ed. 618; Gill v. U. S., 169 U. S. 426, 16 S. Ct. 322, 49 L. Ed. 489; Blauvelt v. Interior Conduit & Insulation Co. (C. C. A.) 89 F. 906. Decision therefore turns, not…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw