WHELAN
v.
THE UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1812-02-20
7 Cranch 112 Supreme Court of the United States (1812) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 286 · 1812 U.S. LEXIS 374 · SCDB 1812-008
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore, 318 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1943)
    …forfeiture exclusive: “The reason of the legislature for putting seizures of this kind on the admiralty side of the court was the great danger to the revenue, if such cases should be left to the caprice of juries.” p. 446. Whelan v. United States, 7 Cranch 112. “This Court decided, as early as 1805 (2 Cranch 405), in the case of the Sally, that the forfeiture of a vessel, under the Act of Congress against the slave-trade, was a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and not of common law. And so it…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw