SCHOONER CATHERINE

v.

THE U. STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United Pub. Workers of Am. (c. I. O.) v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (U.S. 1947)
  …h as preparation of the record, extension of time and cost or supersedeas bonds, are for convenience taken in the court possessed of the record. Rules 10, 11 and 36, Supreme Court; Rule 72, Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 Cranch 239; Bingham v. Morris, 7 Cranch 99; Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall. 97, 103. Compare Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505. Compare Georgia Lumber Co. v. Compañía, 323 U. S. 334. “At this time, when the fate of the entire world is in the balance I believe it is not only proper but an obligat…
• Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall. 97 (U.S. 1865)
• Lenwood Williams, Jr. v. The Shipping Corp. OF India, 653 F.2d 875 (4th Cir. 1981)
  …t a right but a privilege which was granted politically by the forum state. The American doctrine of absolute jurisdictional immunity for a foreign sovereign was announced by Chief Justice Marshall in The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, 7 Cranch 116, 3 L.Ed. 281 (1812), where he stated that since all sovereigns possess “equal rights and equal independence” under international law, a sovereign enters the territory of a friendly foreign government “in the confidence that the immunities belonging to his indepe…