ERNESTINE WILLIAMS AND HERLIN WILLIAMS, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-05-12
No. 63-763
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
165 So. 2d 233 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, Fla.1959, 109 So.2d 5; Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Trusell, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 730 and Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Manning, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 339.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Piehl, 184 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1966)
    …cord of a criminal case reflects and not a later disposition of the first Rule 1 motion is the criterion for determining the merits of the application, both on a hearing in the Circuit Court and on an appeal. See, also, Armstrong v. State (Fla.App), 165 So. 2d 233, and Simpson v. State (Fla.App.), 165 So. 2d 195. Interestingly in this case, the District Court found from the transcript of the record of the trial resulting in the judgment of conviction and sentence of Respondent that the prisoner was apparentl…
  • Garland Leeds v. State, 187 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
    …v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So. 2d 566; and Gaines v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So. 2d 887. The usual procedure in this type case is to affirm, without prejudice to file a sufficient motion. Gaines v. State, supra; Armstrong v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So. 2d 233; and Turner v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So. 2d 11. Accordingly, the order is affirmed without prejudice to defendant’s rights on a subsequent motion. Affirmed. ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw