STEWART
v.
ANDERSON

U.S. | 1810-02-01
6 Cranch 203 Supreme Court of the United States (1810) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 199 · 1810 U.S. LEXIS 331 · SCDB 1810-013
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.

Marshall, Ch. J.

If Hodgson’s note had. not been payable till alter Anderson’s, it would have been a different case; but being pay able, before Anderson’s, and holden by Anderson' before notice, it is such an offset as he might avail himself of at the trial.

Judgment affirmed..

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Patrocinia L. Vda De Rodulfa v. United States & Adm'r of Veterans Affairs, 461 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
    …(repeal of statute conferring jurisdiction) ; Hornthall v. Collector, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 560, 19 L.Ed. 560 (1870) (same); Norris v. Crocker, 54 U.S. (13 How.) 429, 440, 14 L.Ed. 210 (1852) (same); United States v. Ship Helen, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 203, 3 L.Ed. 199 (1810) (same). See also Gurnee v. Patrick County, 137 U.S. 141, 11 S.Ct. 34, 34 L.Ed. 601 (1890); Wilkinson v. Nebraska, 123 U.S. 286, 8 S.Ct. 120, 31 L.Ed. 152 (1887); The Lucy, 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 307, 19 L.Ed. 394 (1869); McNulty v. Batty, 51 U.S.…
  • Ong Chang Wing v. United States, 218 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1910)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw