RIDDLE AND COMPANY
v.
MANDEVILLE AND JAMESSON
RIDDLE AND COMPANY
MANDEVILLE AND JAMESSON
6 Cranch 86
Supreme Court of the United States (1810)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 161 · 1810 U.S. LEXIS 321 · SCDB 1809-046
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.
The court below, is always competent to award costs in a chancery suit iti-that court, and, m case of a mandate, may issue execution herefor.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
First Nat. Bank of Atlanta v. S. Cotton Oil Co., 86 F.2d 33 (5th Cir. 1936)…) 159 F. 73; Presidio Mining Co. v. Overton (C.C. A.) 286 F. 848; In re Independent Machine & Tool Co. (C.C.A.) 251 F. 484. In addition, the complete reversal of the decree opened the whole matter of costs. Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville, 6 Cranch, 86, 3 L.Ed. 161; McKnight v. Craig, Adm’r, 6 Cranch, 183, 3 L.Ed. 193. We agree with appellants, too, that the effect of the reversal establishing appellants’ claim to the fund in complete exclusion of plaintiff and the other supply claimants was to entitle appell…