F. A. CHASTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
RUSSELL GAINES AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
F. A. CHASTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PETITIONER,
RUSSELL GAINES AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
165 So. 2d 168
Florida Supreme Court (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*169pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DuVERNOY v. DuVERNOY, 202 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)…tinuing Legal Education, it is said: “Failure of a divorce judgment to award alimony bars the wife from subsequently applying for alimony under § 65.15, Fla.Stat.1963. Dings v. Dings, Fla.App., 161 So. 2d 227 (3d D.C.A. Fla.1964), cert. dism. Fla., 165 So. 2d 168. Accordingly, counsel should be absolutely sure to have a provision in the final judgment reserving jurisdiction to award alimony or have a nominal sum awarded that would enable the wife to petition for modification at such time as circumstances mig…