THE CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CANADIAN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MIGUEL MORALES CALVO AND MARIA OFELIA ABREAU DE MORALES, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-04-29
No. 62-373
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
163 So. 2d 345 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves a dispute over an insurance policy. The Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District, initially affirmed in part and reversed in part a summary final judgment. However, upon review by the Supreme Court of Florida, the District Court's judgment was quashed and remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint, aligning with precedent set in a related case.


Holding

The District Court of Appeal held that its prior judgment was in conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling and therefore vacated its prior judgment, reversed the appealed judgment, and remanded the case with directions to dismiss the complaint.


Key Quotes

“quashed this court's judgment and remanded the cause for disposition not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida in the case of Confederation Life Ass'n v. Ugalde (164 So. 2d 1), opinion filed February 24, 1964”

This quote explains the Supreme Court's action and the basis for the District Court's subsequent decision.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case originated from a summary final judgment entered by the Circuit Court. The District Court of Appeal had previously affirmed in part and rever…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on April 9, 1963 (151 So.2d 687) affirming in part and reversing in part, with directions, the summary final judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed March 25, 1964 (164 So.2d 813) and mandate dated April 21, 1964, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for disposition not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida in the case of Confederation Life Ass’n v. Ugalde (164 So.2d 1), opinion filed February 24, 1964;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is Ordered that irie mandate of this court issued on April 25, 1963 is withdrawn, so much of this court’s opinion and judgment filed April 9, 1963 that is in conflict with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida in this cause and in the Ugalde case, supra, is hereby vacated, the judgment appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court with directions to dismiss the complaint; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A.).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw