RANI BOLTON
v.
INLAND FRESH SEAFOOD CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Eleventh Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc in this ERISA class action involving the Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The panel's prior opinion was vacated, and the case will be reheard before the full court.
The court granted the petition for rehearing en banc, vacating the panel's prior opinion and ordering the appeal to be reheard before the full court.
“A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc.”
This quote establishes the procedural basis for granting en banc rehearing and the court's order vacating the panel opinion.
Rani Bolton and Melissa Suter brought suit individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries of the Inland Fresh Seafoo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rehearing En Banc cases and more on FLexlaw
BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel's opinion is VACATED.