ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
MINNIE LEE PITTS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS; LIZZIE SMITH PITTS AND MINNIE LEE PITTS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, CROSS-PETITIONERS, V. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, CROSS-RESPONDENT
ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, PETITIONER,
MINNIE LEE PITTS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS; LIZZIE SMITH PITTS AND MINNIE LEE PITTS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, CROSS-PETITIONERS, V. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, CROSS-RESPONDENT
162 So. 2d 517
Florida Supreme Court (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date October 29, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions are therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Danek v. Hoffman, 189 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…allis. The case relied upon by the appellant, Cobb v. Brew, supra, went to the Supreme Court on certiorari. In a four to three per curiam decision the court determined the petition to be without merit and discharged the writ. Brew v. Cobb, Fla.1964, 162 So. 2d 517, 518. We do not interpret this per curiam decision, allowing Cobb v. Brew to stand, as altering the rule of Cloud v. Fallís. We believe that the broad discretion rule requires us to affirm the granting of a new trial here. The transcript yields tot…
-
Miller v. The Honorable Thomas Balikes, 166 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…his court to pass upon the sufficiency of the charges or to suggest the result that should be reached in the Metropolitan Court without first giving that court the opportunity to consider and adjudicate the questions. See Kelly v. Scussel, Fla.1964, 162 So. 2d 517. The order appealed is affirmed.…