SHLOMO YEMINY, PETITIONER,
v.
ADELMAN PIPE & STEEL COMPANY, GENERAL ACCIDENT GROUP, AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
SHLOMO YEMINY, PETITIONER,
ADELMAN PIPE & STEEL COMPANY, GENERAL ACCIDENT GROUP, AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
162 So. 2d 261
Florida Supreme Court (1964)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chastain v. Carroll, 307 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…e for appellee’s commission when they alone did not have the capacity to convey the title to the realty m issue. The appellants contend that the law enunciated in Jones v. Atlas Realty Corp., Fla.App.2nd, 1963, 154 So. 2d 905, cert. discharged Fla., 162 So. 2d 261, is controlling. After careful reading of the cited case we are unable to agree, and point out that the offer made in Jones, supra, was made to Jones and his wife jointly and is an entirely different factual situation than is now before us. Clearly,…