WAYNE CHARLES OKEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE MONSANTO COMPANY, THE SOLARIS GROUP, SCOTTS COMPANY, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MONSANTO COMPANY AND THE SOLARIS GROUP, DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC, DOW AGROSCIENCES, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO DOWELANCO, DOWELANCO, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 2005-08-12
No. 02-15943
Before TJOFLAT and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY , District Judge.
419 F.3d 1312 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: The Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment of this court, 317 F. 3d 1312, and remanded “for further consideration in light of Bates v. Dow Agrosci-ences LLC, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 1788, 161 L.Ed.2d 687.” — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1968, 161 L.Ed.2d 845 (2005). Pursuant to this order, we remand this case to the district court for further consideration in light of Bates.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302 (11th Cir. 2006)
    …(2) one condition that was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Although the district court plainly erred in delegating to the probation officer the decision whether Nash should participate in a mental health program, see United States v. Heath, 419 F. 3d 1312,1315 (11th Cir.2005), the district court did not err in imposing the remaining two conditions, both of which were specifically recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines. We vacate and remand in part and affirm in part. I. BACKGROUND Nash pleaded gui…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw