UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES CRAWFORD JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
CHARLES CRAWFORD JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
407 F.3d 1174
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (2005)
Caution
Cited by 143 cases
Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, concurs in the result that the sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (74 total)
-
United States v. Talley, 431 F.3d 784 (11th Cir. 2005)…District Court Did Not Err in the Sentencing Process. After Booker, sentencing requires two steps. 'First, the district court must consult the Guidelines and correctly calculate the range provided by the Guidelines. See United States v. Crawford, 407 F. 3d 1174, 1178 (11th Cir.2005). Second, the district court must consider several factors to determine a reasonable sentence: (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need to reflect the se…
-
United States v. Baker, 432 F.3d 1189 (11th Cir. 2005)…hough Booker established a 'reasonableness' standard for the sentence finally imposed on a defendant,” Booker does not alter the standards we use to review a district court’s application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Crawford, 407 F. 3d 1174, 1178 (11th Cir.2005). . The recent Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Booker and Crawford v. Washington do not affect our rule that the district court may base sentencing determinations on reliable hearsay. Booker held that when a distri…
-
United States v. Bradley, 644 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2011)…o steps satisfy the court’s procedural duties. Since the Guidelines sentencing range is non-binding post-Booker, the court is free, after considering the § 3553(a) factors, to impose a sentence above or below that range. United States v. Crawford, 407 F. 3d 1174, 1179 (11th Cir.2005). All that is required is that the sentence be substantively reasonable, id., meaning that, in part, it is proportional to such broad notions as “the nature and circumstances of the offense and history and characteristics of th…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 74 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (16 total)
- United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (U.S. 2005)
- Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1993)
- United States v. Scroggins, 880 F.2d 1204 (11th Cir. 1989)
- United States v. Shelton, 400 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 2005)
- United States v. Pace, 898 F.2d 1218 (7th Cir. 1990)
- Glassroth v. Moore, 335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003)
- United States v. Forney, 9 F.3d 1492 (11th Cir. 1993)
- United States v. Ward, 222 F.3d 909 (11th Cir. 2000)
- United States v. Bush, 126 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 1997)
- United States v. Schlaen, 300 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2002)