JASON RAMIREZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Leonard J. Klay, M.D. v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …8 (11th Cir.2004) (“Where prior panel decisions conflict, we follow the first one released.”). However, to the degree Kelly is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s intervening ruling in Howsam, we must adhere to Howsam. See United States v. Marte, 356 F. 3d 1336, 1344 (11th Cir.2004) (“We are authorized to depart from a prior panel decision based upon an intervening Supreme Court decision only if that decision actually overruled or conflicted with it.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)). Under the ap…
• United States v. Vega-Castillo, 540 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …an en banc decision. Thus, the only issue is whether the Supreme Court has done so. For the Supreme Court to overrule a case, its decision must have “actually overruled or conflicted with [this court’s prior precedent].” See United States v. Marte, 356 F. 3d 1336, 1344 (11th Cir.2004) (citation and quotation omitted). There is a difference between the holding in a case and the reasoning that supports that holding. Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc. v. Townsend, 496 F. 3d 1282, 1284 (11th Cir.2007). Even if the…
• United States v. Hill, 643 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2011)
  …tation marks omitted). In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, “we look at the record in the light most favorable to the verdict” and draw all reasonable inferences and resolve all questions of credibility in its favor. United States v. Marte, 356 F. 3d 1336, 1344 (11th Cir.2004). A. Farmer Farmer contends that we must vacate his convictions for money laundering and his conviction for conspiracy, which included allegations of money laundering as overt acts performed in furtherance of the conspiracy. He…

Authorities Cited

• Ramirez v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co., 321 F.3d 1055 (11th Cir. 2003)