UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

SIGMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., D.B.A. SIGMA U.S.A., INC., CHARLES STERNISHA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Solantic, LLC v. City OF Neptune Beach, 410 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …utory appeal, pursuant -to 28 U:S.C. § 1292(a)(1). II. A. The decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction “is within the sound discretion of the district court and'will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” Palmer v. Braun, 287 F. 3d 1325, 1329 (11th Cir.2002); see also, e.g., Horton, 272 F. 3d at 1326; Siegel v. LePore, 234 F. 3d 1163, 1178 (11th Cir.2000). We review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and its application of the law de novo, “premised on the unde…
• United States v. Sigma Int'l, Inc., 300 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …PER CURIAM: After granting en banc rehearing in this case, United States v. Sigma Int’l, Inc., 287 F. 3d 1325 (11th Cir.2002), we were informed the parties had negotiated a settlement of the case, and we relinquished jurisdiction to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing it to accept the plea agreement and enter a judgment in accordance with…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Peter Letterese & Assocs., Inc. v. World Inst. OF Scientology Enters., 533 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …dea is never eligible for copyright protection. But while Les Dane could not have copyrighted the underlying sales technique, any original expression he used to describe that technique falls squarely into the realm of copyright. See Palmer v. Braun, 287 F. 3d 1325, 1331 (11th Cir.2002) (noting that the idea “that people’s beliefs can alter how they experience and understand their fives” is not copyrightable, but “the question is whether [plaintiffs course] expresses this idea in a way that infringes on origin…

  ← 1 / 2 →