MICHAEL A. HADDLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JEANETTE G. GARRISON, DENNIS KELLY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 1999-02-22
Nos. 96-8856, 96-9072
Before COX and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and HUNT , District Judge.
168 F.3d 413 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: The judgments of the district court are, pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, reversed, and these cases are remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • O'Halloran v. First Union Nat'l Bank OF Fla., 350 F.3d 1197 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …e complaint, for the Ponzi scheme, but as the holder of voidable title to the funds (as opposed to void title) was legally injured by Payne’s withdrawals from the First Union accounts. See B.R.L. Equip. Rentals, Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F. 3d 413, 415-16 (11th Cir.1999) (noting that “the possessor of property obtained via a worthless check has ‘voidable’ title to the property-the possessor has title, but the seller can avoid that title as against the buyer upon discovery of the fraud”); Mazz…
  • David & Barbara Driscoll v. Adams, 181 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 1999)
    …mental jurisdiction over the state law claims and dismissed them without reaching the merits. The plaintiffs appealed. We review de novo the district court’s award of summary judgment. See B.R.L. Equip. Rentals Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F. 3d 413, 415 (11th Cir.1999). We also review de novo the district court’s conclusions of law. See Brooks v. Miller, 158 F. 3d 1230, 1236 (11th Cir.1998). II. DISCUSSION Adams raises essentially two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the Clean Water…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw