AURELIA DAVIS, AS NEXT FRIEND OF LASHONDA D., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Monroe Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 526 U.S. 629 (U.S. 1999)
  …control,” ibid., and the court concluded that petitioner had alleged facts sufficient to support a claim for hostile environment sexual harassment on this theory, id., at 1195. The Eleventh Circuit granted the Board’s motion for rehearing en banc, 91 F. 3d 1418 (1996), and affirmed the District Court’s decision to dismiss petitioner’s Title IX claim against the Board, 120 F. 3d 1390 (1998). The en banc court relied, primarily, on the theory that Title IX was passed pursuant to Congress’ legislative authori…
• Attwood v. Singletary, 105 F.3d 610 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …the veracity of information filed before the court and to advise the court of any changes. Contrary to Attwood’s assertion, his obligations under Rule 11 are not measured solely at the time of filing. See Turner v. Sungard Business Systems, Inc., 91 F. 3d 1418 (11th Cir.1996). Furthermore, this court has upheld dismissal where a plaintiff deliberately failed to advise the court of a prior determination that the plaintiff was not indigent. Dawson v. Lennon, 797 F. 2d 934 (11th Cir.1986). Due process req…
• In re Engle Cases 4432 Individual Tobacco v. Various Tobacco Cos., 767 F.3d 1082 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …od v. Singletary, 105 F. 3d 610, 613 (11th Cir.1997) (“Rule 11 requires [an attorney] to make reasonable inquiries into the veracity of information filed before the court and to advise the court of any changes.”); Turner v. Sungard Bus. Sys., Inc., 91 F. 3d 1418, 1422 (11th Cir.1996) (“[A] litigant’s obligations with respect to the contents of [his pleadings] are not measured solely as of the time they are filed with or submitted to the court, but include reaffirming to the court and advocating positions co…