G. STEWART MCHENRY, WENT FOR IT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, JOHN T. BLAKELY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
THE FLORIDA BAR, SUSAN V. BLOEMENDAAL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

11th Cir. | 1995-09-22
No. 93-2069
Before BLACK, Circuit Judge, DYER, Senior Circuit Judge, and ALAIMO , Senior District Judge.
66 F.3d 270 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1995) Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: On June 21, 1995, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in McHenry v. Florida Bar, 21 F. 3d 1038 (11th Cir.1994). See Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc., — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2371, 132 L.Ed.2d 541. (1995). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff, McHenry v. Florida Bar, 808 F.Supp. 1543 (M.D.Fla.1992), and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …federal right allegedly infringed was clearly established.” Id. (citations, internal quotation marks, and brackets omitted). The contrary holdings in Mastroianni v. Bowers, 74 F. 3d 236, 238 (11th Cir.1996), and Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F. 3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995), preceded Behrens and cannot be reconciled with it. Where prior panel precedent conflicts with a subsequent Supreme Court decision, we follow the Supreme Court decision. E.g., Lufkin v. McCallum, 956 F. 2d 1104, 1107 (11th Cir.1…
  • Dolihite v. Robert Maughon, M.D., 74 F.3d 1027 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …F. 3d 236 (11th Cir.1996) ("Insofar as appeals from denials of summary judgment relate to 'factual disputes' or 'insufficiency of evidence' regarding plaintiff's claim, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction.”); Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F. 3d 270, 272 (11th Cir.1995) ("An order determining the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of fact — the sufficiency of the evidence — is not immediately appealable.”). Unlike Johnson and unlike Ratliff, the primary argument of each appealing p…
  • Haney v. City OF Cumming, 69 F.3d 1098 (11th Cir. 1995)
    …we have jurisdiction over Matthews’ and Griffin’s appeal, but only insofar as the district court’s order turns on purely legal issues. Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2156, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995); Babb v. Lake City Community College, 66 F. 3d 270 (11th Cir.1995). Our jurisdiction over the remaining claims presented to us on appeal is a more problematic question. This case is one that involves multiple claims and multiple parties, and the district court’s order on summary judgment disposed…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw