UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MAURIE WADE SHIELDS, A/K/A CHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

11th Cir. | 1995-09-13
No. 93-9270
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
65 F.3d 900 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

(Opinion April 10, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 49 F. 3d 707) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Maurie Wade Shields, 87 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …r who is apprehended after harvest may not be sentenced according to the number of plants involved. United States v. Shields, 49 F. 3d 707, 712-13 (11th Cir.1995). We vacated the panel opinion and granted rehearing en banc. United States v. Shields, 65 F. 3d 900 (11th Cir.1995). We hold that a defendant who has grown and harvested marijuana plants should be sentenced according to the number of plants involved, and affirm the district court. I. Background Maurie Shields and Joseph O’Reilly rented a house…
  • In re Trusted NET Media Holdings, LLC v. The Morrison Agency, Inc., 525 F.3d 1095 (11th Cir. 2008)
    …ust completed their harvest over growers who have not yet harvested their marijuana plants was a necessary predicate to the Osbum court’s subsequent consideration of the defendants’ constitutional challenge to that sentencing distinction”), vacated, 65 F. 3d 900 (11th Cir.1995) (en banc). Therefore, we conclude that we are bound by All Media’s decision that the requirements of § 303(b) must be satisfied in order for the bankruptcy court to have subject matter jurisdiction over an involuntary bankruptcy cas…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw