GREGORY JOSEPH SETTLE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Gregory Joseph Settle appeals his conviction and sentence in an Anders brief. The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirms the judgment and sentence but remands to correct the Teen Court Fund assessment to $6.00 to reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement limiting the cost to two counts.
The court affirms the judgment and sentence but remands the case to reduce the Teen Court Fund cost to $6.00 to conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement that the cost applies only to counts II and III.
[1] When a trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence conflicts with the written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls and the written order must be corrected to confor…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[QUOTE REDACTED — failed verbatim audit (paraphrase, not verbatim). See original_text for the text as originally displayed.]”
Establishes the court's holding that the conviction is affirmed but remand is required for cost correction.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSettle was convicted of crimes in Circuit Court for Citrus County. The trial court imposed a sentence including a Teen Court Fund cost that was incons…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Pronouncement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand to reduce the Teen Court Fund cost to $6.00 to match the trial court’s oral pronouncement that the 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
cost applies only to counts II and III. See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007); see also § 938.19(2), Fla. Stat. (2023).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.
EISNAUGLE, HARRIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.