UPPAL
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Department of Health's final order revoking Appellant's medical license was affirmed because Appellant established no ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, to set aside the agency decision.
[1] A medical license may be revoked under Florida Statutes section 458.331(1)(b) or (1)(x) when the licensee's license has been revoked by another state or when the licensee…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant's medical license was revoked by the State of New York in January 2017. Appellant subsequently practiced medicine during February and March …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Substantial Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the final order of the Department of Health revoking Appellant’s license to practice medicine because of violations of sections 458.331(1)(b) and 458.331(1)(x), Florida Statutes. The Department provided competent, substantial evidence that the violations occurred upon the revocation of Appellant’s medical license by the State of New York in January 2017 as well as Appellant’s practice of medicine during February and March 2019 in violation of a Department order in a previous, separate disciplinary proceeding.
Because Appellant establishes no ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, to set aside the agency final order, the order is AFFIRMED.
RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Neelam Taneja Uppal, pro se, Appellant.
Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2