JUNITA SAWYER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2024-11-20
No. 4D2023-2555
2024 FL 13229 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Rule 3.800(b) provides an alternative method of preserving alleged sentencing errors for review on direct appeal but is designed for use only in direct appeal from the sentence at issue.


Headnotes

[1] Rule 3.800(b) provides an alternative method of preserving alleged sentencing errors for review on direct appeal and was designed for use only during direct appeal from t…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“rule 3.800(b) provides only 'an alternative method of preserving for review an alleged sentencing error' and 'was designed for use only in a direct appeal from the sentence at issue'”

Court citing Cooper v. State to explain the limited scope of Rule 3.800(b)

Facts & Procedural History

Junita Sawyer appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Broward County denying her Rule 3.800(b) motion to correct sentencing error.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 919 So. 2d 516, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (observing that rule 3.800(b) provides only “an alternative method of preserving for review an alleged sentencing error” and “was designed for use only in a direct appeal from the sentence at issue”); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) (“If an appeal is pending, a defendant . . . may file in the trial court a motion to correct a sentencing error.” (emphasis added)). KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw