ROBERT R. MENDEZ
v.
CASA FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A judgment is not void due to procedural errors, irregularities, or wrongdoing short of illegal deprivation of the opportunity to be heard, provided the court had jurisdiction and the parties were given notice and opportunity to be heard.
[1] Procedural errors, irregularities, and wrongdoing in court proceedings do not render a judgment void when the court is legally organized with jurisdiction of the subject…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[W]here a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given the opportunity to be heard, then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”
Court citing Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Condo. Ass'n of La Mer Ests., Inc., 175 So. 3d 282, 285 (Fla. 2015)
Robert R. Mendez appealed a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The case involved CASA Financial Holdings, LLC.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Opportunity To Be Heard cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Condo. Ass’n of La Mer Ests., Inc., 175 So. 3d 282, 285 (Fla. 2015) (“[W]here a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given the opportunity to be heard, then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”) (quotation omitted); see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)(5) (noting that a “motion shall be filed within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) not more than 1 year after the judgment, decree, order, or proceeding was entered or taken.”).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- The Bank OF NEW York Mellon v. Condo. Ass'n OF LA MER Ests., Inc., 175 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 2015)