ALISSA PETITFRERE
v.
SUMMERFIELD MULTIFAMILY PARTNERS LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court judgment without a record of the trial proceedings to evaluate whether the judgment is supported by the evidence or whether the trial court misapplied the law.
[1] An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court judgment without a complete record of the trial proceedings, as such a record is necessary to determine whether the judgme…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”
Court's justification for affirming judgment, citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
Alissa Petitfrere appealed from a judgment entered by Orange County Circuit Court in a case against Summerfield Multifamily Partners, LLC. The appella…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Correctness Of Trial Court Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. 9.130 from the County Court for Orange County. Andrew L. Cameron, Judge.
May 31, 2024 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”). TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
2
Alissa Petitfrere, Orlando, pro se. William J. McCabe, Longwood, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED