CLINTON FIELDS
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Clinton Fields sought certiorari review of a circuit court's denial of a writ of mandamus challenging the Florida Commission on Offender Review's decision. The District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision, holding that the circuit court properly provided procedural due process and applied the correct legal standard in reviewing the agency action.
The writ of certiorari is denied because the circuit court provided the petitioner with procedural due process and applied the correct law in reviewing the Commission's final agency action.
[1] In appellate review of final agency action by the Commission on Offender Review, the court must ensure the agency's decision complies with procedural due process requirem…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because the circuit court provided the petitioner with procedural due process and applied the correct law, the writ is denied on the merits.”
The court's stated basis for denying the writ of certiorari, establishing that both procedural fairness and correct legal application must be present.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involves a petitioner seeking review of a decision by the Florida Commission on Offender Review. The circuit court reviewed this agency actio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Agency Action cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s denial of the writ of mandamus following the circuit court’s appellate review of final agency action by the Commission on Offender Review. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 720 So. 2d 216, 217 (Fla. 1998). Because the circuit court provided the petitioner with procedural due process and applied the correct law, the writ is denied on the merits. See Florida Parole Comm’n v. Taylor, 132 So. 3d 780, 783 (Fla. 2014); see also Currie v. Comm’n on Offender Rev., 295 So. 3d 339, 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (denying writ of certiorari; circuit court applied correct law to deny relief on appellate review of Commission’s extension of presumptive parole release date based on “new information”).
DENIED.
LEWIS, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1998)
- Kolb v. Fla. Comm'n on Offender Review (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)