LEWIS
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A regulatory agency's motion for clarification and subsequent response regarding an adverse appeal order constitutes a concession of error warranting reversal and remand.
[1] A regulatory board's motion for clarification and accompanying response to an adverse appeal order may be treated as a concession of error, warranting reversal and remand…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCurtis E. Lewis appealed a decision of the Construction Industry Licensing Board. The Board filed a joint motion for clarification on October 13, 2023…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concession Of Error cases and more on FLexlaw
February 21, 2024 PER CURIAM.
The Court treats the joint motion for clarification filed October 13, 2023, along with Appellee’s response filed December 11, 2023, as a concession of error by Appellee. See Stacey v. Dep’t of Pro. Regul., Bd. of Nursing Home Adm’rs, 547 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The Court reverses the order on appeal and remands the cause for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED. LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.