RICKY D. DIXON, SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
v.
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR., LEAH JAMES FRAME
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A state official acting in official capacity is entitled to sovereign immunity under Florida law when the underlying tort claim is based on employee bad faith or malicious purpose.
[1] An order denying a motion to dismiss asserting entitlement to sovereign immunity under section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes, is reviewable on appeal as a non-final order.
[2] The state is immune from tort claims based on an employee acting in bad faith or with a malicious purpose.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellee filed a complaint against Florida Department of Corrections employees alleging they intentionally destroyed his boxes of legal documents in a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fla. Stat. § 768.28(9)(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
February 21, 2024 PER CURIAM.
Appellee filed a complaint against several employees of the Florida Department of Corrections, alleging they mishandled his personal property. Appellant Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing, among other things, that Secretary Dixon was entitled to sovereign immunity pursuant to section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes. The lower court denied the motion to dismiss. This timely appeal followed.
2
An order denying a motion to dismiss is a non-final order and not typically reviewable on appeal. However, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(F)(ii) allows appeals of non-final orders that deny a motion that asserts entitlement to immunity under section 768.28(9). This Court can therefore review the denial of the sovereign immunity claim.
Appellee’s complaint alleges that certain Department of Corrections employees destroyed his boxes of legal documents. He alleges that the employees’ actions were retaliatory and intentionally done in bad faith with a malicious purpose. The state is immune from tort claims that are based on an employee acting in bad faith or with a malicious purpose. So, as pled, Secretary Dixon, in his official capacity as the head of the Department of Corrections, is immune.
REVERSED.
RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.