MARK MARQUIS VEREEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2024-01-17
No. 2023-0022
2024 FL 451 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied where the defendant had previously consented to entry into the home, and evidence supported that such consent was revoked.


Headnotes

[1] Where a defendant had previously obtained limited, implied consent to enter a home but evidence supports that such consent was revoked, a trial court may properly deny a…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“affirming the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal where the defendant previously had 'limited, implied consent to enter the home,' but the jury received evidence that the consent was revoked”

Citation to Dubois v. State, establishing the legal standard for judging sufficiency of evidence in cases involving entry with revoked consent

Facts & Procedural History

Mark Marquis Vereen appealed from a trial court decision denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in a criminal case involving entry into a home. …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

January 17, 2024 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Dubois v. State, 247 So. 3d 34, 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal where the defendant previously had “limited, implied consent to enter the home,” but the jury received evidence that the consent was revoked).

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw