AMON RICHARDS
v.
TED GJERDE, RICKY D. DIXON, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of mandamus must be dismissed as moot when the trial court has already resolved the pending pleading that was the subject of the mandamus petition.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus is moot when the trial court has already issued a ruling on the pleading that was the subject of the mandamus petition.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had given the petitioner a ruling on the pending pleading below”
The court cited Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) for the mootness doctrine
Amon Richards, a pro se petitioner, sought a writ of mandamus against Ted Gjerde and Ricky D. Dixon of the Florida Department of Corrections. The tria…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mootness Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
November 22, 2023 PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had given the petitioner a ruling on the pending pleading below). ROWE, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.