LATERIK BAYNARD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly revoked probation based on competent, substantial evidence that the appellant willfully violated a condition of his probation.
[1] On Anders review, a finding of competent, substantial evidence supporting a willful violation of a probation condition is sufficient to sustain probation revocation on ap…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLaterik Baynard was on probation and allegedly violated a condition thereof. The trial court revoked his probation.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Review cases and more on FLexlaw
November 22, 2023 PER CURIAM.
An Anders1 review of the record in Laterik Baynard’s case reveals no arguable issues on appeal. There was competent, substantial evidence that he willfully violated a condition of his probation. The revocation of his probation was proper. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.