GAZUL PRODUCCIONES SL UNIPERSONAL, ETC.
v.
SHEDDF2-FL5 LLC, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party waives jurisdictional defects, including defects in service of process, by taking a step in the proceeding amounting to a general appearance before the court.
[1] A defendant waives objections to defects in service of process by making a general appearance in the proceeding without timely asserting the defect.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A party submits to the jurisdiction of the court and waives jurisdictional defects by taking a step in the proceeding amounting to an appearance.”
Starks v. Howard, 611 So. 2d 52, 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
Gazul Producciones SL Unipersonal appealed a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County involving a dispute with SHEDDF2-FL5 LLC.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Submission To Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Starks v. Howard, 611 So. 2d 52, 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“A party submits to the jurisdiction of the court and waives jurisdictional defects by taking a step in the proceeding amounting to an appearance.”); Laura M. Watson, P.A. v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., 162 So. 3d 102, 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“Florida law is well established that service of process, and any defect in service of process, can be waived by the general appearance of a party before the trial court.”); Parra v. Raskin, 647 So. 2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“[W]hen a defendant waives an objection to insufficient service of process by failing to timely object, the defendant thereby consents to litigate the action and the court may not, either on the defendant’s motion or its own initiative, dismiss the suit for insufficient service of process.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Parra v. Raskin, 647 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Mary Starks & the Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Marcine Howard, Jr., 611 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Laura M. Watson, P.A. v. Stewart Tilghman FOX & Bianchi, P.A., 162 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)